You do not need the private data to correlate
The instinct with fatigue and driver-monitoring systems is to assume that useful correlation needs the most sensitive data: the name of the operator, the face on the camera. It does not.
CalibrAIte correlates on approved event signals. An IVMS harsh-braking event, a fatigue alert, a telematics derate and a proximity warning can be related to an asset, a zone and a time without ever resolving a person's identity. The correlation is about what happened on site, not who to blame.
Sensitive data stays scoped and role-gated
Where sensitive personal data does exist, it stays scoped to the roles entitled to see it. A maintenance planner does not see fatigue-monitoring detail. A contractor admin sees only their own people and assets, never the hiring company's internal data.
Role-gating is built into the Platform by design, not bolted on. Each role sees only the version of an event it is allowed to see, and every access is recorded in the audit trail.
Evidence, not a verdict on a person
CalibrAIte produces evidence and draft outputs. It never produces a safe or unsafe verdict, and it never holds final authority over an individual.
That boundary is what keeps duty of care intact. The system makes the pattern visible and cites the evidence behind it. Competent people make the decisions about people, and they stay responsible for them.